Let’s do our part to help build Malaysia

The Colombian experience

During my time at Shell in Holland some 25 years ago, I made visits to the Colombian cities of Bogota and Cartagena for work purposes. At the time, it struck me that the country was still grappling with the throes and challenges of poverty typical of third world countries. Owing to many years of armed conflict, these struggles were very real and it was played out right there on the streets for all to see.

A few weeks ago, at the invitation of the Colombian government, I made a visit to Bogota. Recalling what I previously witnessed, I embarked on the 30 hour journey with much trepidation at heart.

Upon arrival, I was happy to note that in 25 years Bogota had changed a lot for the better, demonstrating visible signs of progress in the city. This transformation provided a refreshing perspective, allowing also for a better outside-in view of our own journey as a country.

The Colombians, highly impressed with Malaysia’s national transformation programme, reached out for us to share this experience at a conference to mark the Colombia National Competitiveness Report launch. I was given a standing ovation after my presentation. On the other hand, Malaysia has a few lessons from Colombia too.

Two points that I would like to share from my recent visit is the thriving bus rapid transit system in Bogota, and their take on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA).

I was enthralled that Colombia had become one of the world’s examples for the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), pulling it off in a setting as dense as Bogota, which is home to more than 7 million people.

In a tight urban sprawl choking with motorists fighting for space on roads – not dissimilar to Kuala Lumpur – setting up a dedicated lane for buses means less space for cars and it certainly did not go down too well.

But today, Bogota’s BRT stands as a global benchmark in deploying a cost-effective and efficient urban mass transit option. And they did this ahead of us.

Upon reflection, we have been talking about a similar model for the last six years but breakthrough only came with the commencement of the elevated Sunway BRT Service in June 2015. Being an elevated BRT obviously means additional cost, however, it is still ground-breaking. For the first time, Malaysians have the opportunity to sample the convenience of the BRT system in a larger scale. In short, no traffic jams and on-the-dot punctuality.

This pilot BRT system has been part of the Government’s prioritisation to introduce more solutions for numerous public transportation issues. Amongst which is to develop a similar model for the Federal Highway.

The initial idea to develop the Federal Highway BRT was met with a usual chorus of critics. Many felt that reducing road space for cars on the crowded highway would not work. Some lobbied for an elevated highway, but where is the sense in that? Not only will the design and structure of such a highway jack up costs significantly, it is counter-productive.

Having elevated highways in congested areas would simply shift the problem by creating more bottlenecks instead of addressing it. This does not help to reduce the number of cars on the road by 2020 with urban public transport having a modal share of 40% or more. To do that, we need radical, proven and acceptable solutions.

Upon conclusion of relevant studies and public syndication, the Cabinet has given the green light for work on the Federal Highway BRT to begin.

My second observation during the trip involves the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA). At the conference, Minister of Commerce, Industry and Tourism, Cecilia Alvarez Correa presented the country’s position of good economic growth although challenges prevailed in global competitiveness.

Here she chided the country’s private sector for their fickleness in adopting the TPPA. Having caused the Government to miss the first round of negotiations on concerns of losing to foreign competitors, these same voices of dissent is now accusing the Government of not liberalising to facilitate competitive Colombian exports. It was sad, she said, that Colombia had missed that chance and Malaysia was fortunate to be one of 12 countries that have reached the final stage.

Reaching the finishing line was arduous. The Prime Minister had made it abundantly clear that the TPPA would only be negotiated on our terms, which would serve us as an exporting nation, as well as providing competitive opportunities for Bumiputera and state-owned enterprises.

I understand, as a matter of fact, that Malaysia came very close to being ejected because we had demanded too much. Yes Dato’ Sri Mustapa and his team were tough as nails, doing a very, very good job in presenting our case in convincing the 11 countries to accept our demands. Tirelessly, they delivered about 50 briefings to Cabinet throughout the years.

Now that we are at the critical juncture of getting it passed in Parliament, the threat comes in the form of those looking at the matter from a ‘protectionist’ lens.

We are a nation whose total trade is 150% of our GDP. We do not really have the option of backing down but instead to see this is a coveted opportunity to increase trade.

Opposing the TPPA will only cut us at the knees in the long term. Take oil palm, for example. We are the second largest CPO producer, with Indonesia in the lead. They are not part of the deal, we are. With this deal, all 11 countries are open to us without import duties or levies, not Indonesia. Do you see the competitive edge if we sign? We would be in a clear advantage.

In determining the way forward, these are the questions we should weigh:

  1. How can Malaysia benefit as much from the fact that we have free access to those markets? There are many countries that are not signatories and now we have full access with no levies. Doesn’t this put us in a stronger position to drive up trade and gain from it?
  2. What do we lose from not signing it? Can you imagine the price we have to pay if other competing trading partners are a part of it and we have to wait for the next round of negotiations?

Becoming globally competitive creates strong, resilient companies. There is much to be gained by breaking away from the shackles of myopia and protectionism.

It was a rare opportunity to present Malaysia’s success to the Colombians, and that too to an appreciative crowd. The last thing I expected from the audience of about 500 people – from their public and private sectors – was a standing ovation.  It was a remarkable and heart-warming moment for our country and our achievements because none of the other 19 speakers received this honour. The Malaysia story had captured both their imagination and hearts.

Although there is plenty of room to improve in Malaysia, my Colombian experience proves that we have recorded good strides as a young nation, and to those who strive for such progress, our experience sets a fine example as we continue to build a better Malaysia for all.

Aligning the Constellations

The red flag has been raised for some time on English proficiency among school students. It has been a ‘hot button’ issue especially for concerned parents and employers and yet, consensus remained elusive.

In September, PEMANDU designed a simple anonymous online survey to gauge public opinion on the importance of English proficiency among school students. In just one week, more than 90 percent of the 190,000 respondents came back to say they were in favour of upping English standards in schools.

The survey went viral in a way I never imagined it would. Everywhere I went, people said they had replied and commended the Government’s efforts to find a solution. Journalists – both local and international – were buzzing with questions, keen to know what we were up to.

A majority of survey respondents came from urban areas. This clearly meant we had touched on an issue very close to their hearts.

Rural respondents comprised 10 percent of the survey, with many agreeing that a solution was imperative. Regardless, the Government also acknowledged real concerns amongst this group on whether children would be able to cope if there were blanket rules on teaching crucial subjects in English.

Stakeholder engagements and results from the survey provided a basis for the Ministry of Education (MOE) to build a compelling pitch from its English lab to the Economic Council chaired by PM.

Conducted in July, the lab facilitated by PADU and PEMANDU introduced two new programmes under the existing Upholding Bahasa Malaysia and Strengthening the English Language (MBMMBI) policy:

  1. Highly Immersive Programme (HIP)
  2. Dual Language Programme (DLP)

The Prime Minister’s Budget 2016 included an allocation of RM135 million to support these programmes and a sum of RM38.5 million from this total has been earmarked to facilitate a pilot project to launch HIP and DLP in 2016.


HIP enrichment activities are not entirely new, since the programme is a reinforcement of the 1999 MOE circular.  What is new is the implementation approach – empowering schools, by the schools and for the schools.

Toolkits for purposeful activity planning featuring best practice examples from urban and rural schools would be provided based on their local contexts and capabilities. Support mechanisms at the district and state levels will be ramped up and by the end of 2016, approximately 1,000 schools are expected to implement the HIP.


Meanwhile, the DLP involves teaching in English, subjects such as Mathematics, Science, Design Technology and ICT. Its pilot phase will involve 300 schools that meet certain criteria. To make this work, we need school leaders who agree to implement, capable teachers to teach in English and parents wanting this programme for their children.  At the same time, schools must meet the BM mastery levels set by MoE.

Other schools wanting to be part of DLP can convey their interest to district education offices so the necessary processes can kick in to assess the school’s readiness.

The English lab recommendations on HIP and DLP were fully supported by top Government leadership -the Prime Minister, previous Minister of Education, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, current Minister of Education, Dato’ Seri Mahdzir Khalid, the Economic Council, Cabinet and senior MOE officials.

Given diverse views about teaching other subjects in English, the Government settled on middle ground. We believe the right way in managing polarities is to trigger a bottom-up approach by introducing the element of ‘choice’ for schools and parents. They are now empowered to decide what they want for their children’s future without compromising BM proficiency.

In taking into account concerns that BM proficiency is not compromised at schools, MOE, with both PADU and PEMANDU will be planning a lab in 2016 to study this area.

There are 70,000 English teachers in our national schools. To date, close to 12,000 teachers from three cohorts have been upskilled over a period of one year. The first two cohorts have been retested with approximately 60 per cent improving at least one band under the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) English proficiency benchmark.

Many Malaysians have been ceaseless in criticising Government for not taking the right stand in improving English proficiency. In one of my previous columns, I touched upon the four constellations – principal, teacher, parent and student – needing to be in alignment to make any school great.

With the HIP and DLP in place, MOE has created an environment to activate the aligning of these constellations.

More importantly, if you have noticed, decentralisation of decision-making and empowerment of schools and parents are already at-play. The future of your children have been placed in your hands as the Government focuses on facilitating a conducive learning atmosphere.

Returning to the importance of English proficiency, growing up in deep interiors of the Sarawakian highlands may have been a blessing in disguise for me. There is only so much village-life can do to fascinate you. Boyish curiosity drove me to become a school librarian because that gave me access to read as many books and find out more about the world yonder. This was my first immersion into English language.

I worked for Shell, an international company for 23 years. In places like London, Holland and Sri Lanka, where I was based – there was no way to excel without being able to speak English. Whilst language is crucial for employability, confidence in the language gives you an edge over global peers.

Ultimately, I believe once you master English, the world becomes your oyster. Now that the decisions lie within the constellations, there’s nothing to hold us back.

Delivering Transformation

Schwarzenegger charms the crowd with his six rules of success

I make no bones I particularly dislike one word loosely bandied about in corporate speak, and that word is ‘strategy’. As much as talk is cheap, to some extent, so is strategy. I would go as far as to say that if organisations want to see results, it is certainly not in the belaboured hours […]

Continue reading...

Surviving the new reality


In this combative climate, it is difficult for even the stubborn optimist to see a silver lining. The ringgit hitting record lows against the US dollar, a volatile stock exchange reacting to hot money flows, and the downward spiral of energy prices are fodder for worries. Throw in the widening trust deficit, and you end […]

Continue reading...

Finding Common Ground

I recently met a young chap, Amierul, the co-founder of the Greater Malaysia portal. We talked about how, as a multicultural and diverse nation, we keep finding ourselves battling racial and religious tensions. Festering political noises have become the tinder that threatens to engulf the headway we make as a growing, advancing economy. His final […]

Continue reading...

The Journey Continues

During my childhood growing up in the Kelabit longhouse, my father – always the teacher – would use the word ketui to spur me on. Meaning ‘burning desire to win’, he did not accept half-measures and lukewarm efforts. He was adamant I embody the burning desire, especially when the going got tough. After serving for […]

Continue reading...

Fixing the politics of money

My last column on regulating political financing placed me in the direct line of ire of readers and politicians. Salvos were shot through social media and bumping into friends would inevitably lead to robust exchanges. Advocates and the like-minded lent their support, acknowledging the merits of regulation with calls to stop the bickering and politicising […]

Continue reading...

Throwing Down the Gauntlet

Political donations is the current hot topic. Bombarded on a daily basis especially the last few weeks with one sensational revelation after another, the Malaysian news landscape has become a battle zone of politics, politicking and cries of corruption. Trying to separate the wheat from the chaff on what is fact and what is fiction […]

Continue reading...

Staying Resilient in Challenging Times

The world is not short of problems. Geopolitical uncertainty, racial and religious tension, market and financial volatility continue to grab headlines and dictate water-cooler conversations. Behind closed-doors, governments struggle to find balance, dealing with what feels like a world economic system conspiring against them. Malaysia is not shielded from the impact of external headwinds. With […]

Continue reading...

Getting on the bus

Passengers getting on the bus on the BRT Sunway system

In trying to get people out of their cars and give public transportation a shot, daily commuters can be persuaded to consider the train. Getting on the bus is a different matter altogether. Many see it as a harrowing experience of an interminable wait whether it is for the bus to arrive or the stress […]

Continue reading...